In Praise of Class

The reason why wealthy people prefer to hire Third World nannies and gardeners has very little to do with money. Sure, they don’t actually like to pay things like insurance, Social Security, disability, etc., but that’s not the whole point. The point is that Third Worlders and people who don’t speak English well know their place.

In our “classless society” ordinary people don’t. It gets awkward.

With a language barrier, one is not “friends” with The Help.

Marriage also, by the way, once benefited from class.

The idea of having one’s outcomes pretty well guaranteed by The Master and Mistress is not such a bad thing. Depending on Government to guarantee one’s outcomes leads to dissatisfaction and all matter of Government dystopia.

It is also not such a bad deal for women to surrender their agency to The Patriarchy in exchange for State-guaranteed outcomes.

For whatever it’s worth, I have no idea of what is my own true “class”. Supposedly, in my parents’ and grandparents’ day “Education” trumped all. I suspect that this idea was borne out of The Great Depression such that observing the misery of the farmers losing pretty well everything was enough to make those who presumed to be of a class above the farmers to not in any way—no how—be farmers. Even if they were.

Supposedly, “Education” insulated oneself from being starved and degraded, with the hereditary estate surrendered to The Banks. No wonder no one wanted to have “class” anymore.

The myth that farmers are somehow illiterate and poorly educated also sprang out of that era, in my opinion. After all, back in the days of the original U.S. Colonies, according to John Taylor Gatto, farmers had vocabularies that would put the average tenured academic of today to shame.

During The Winter, while the livestock rests in straw-fermentation-manure-heated barns, there’s not a lot to do. Reading books of more challenging bent than today’s pulp was the norm. Children were educated and apprenticed into useful activity. There was no such thing as “adolescence.” Not such a bad life, by my reckoning.

However, homesteading is not for everyone. Sometimes people starved or were stormed by savages. Outcomes were not guaranteed by The State. Oh well. That’s where God comes in.

At least one branch of my family tree were indentured servants. That could easily be a miserable life. However, one of the inducements of The Revolutionary War, which that particular bastard son of a Scottish Earl, and two other ancestors (Scotch-Irish, Pennsylvania Dutch, Huguenot, English, French, German, etc.), partook in, was the sense of “gentry” that exceeded the immigrants which came later. Investing by means of risking one’s life as a new arrival in a new nation has benefits.

However, servitude, where one’s outcomes are guaranteed by the prosperity of The Master or Mistress is not necessarily such a bad life. If that is one that one is cut out to be. Not everyone can be the boss, and who really wants to be? Naturally, not all bosses are equal, but wise ones realize that investment over time involves shared outcomes.

Again, not really knowing my class but having more than one “educator” in the family tree, back when “educators” were sort of like “snake oil salesmen” in terms of their trustworthy factor, I intuit based on conversations that it was extremely important for my Depression Era grandparents to represent themselves as “educated”.

However, they were evenly divided between “the industrious” and “the grande dame”. I suspect that some of that last was then, as now, sort of a consumerist/celebrity/media driven/Feminist hybrid.

When I was a child, the “Southern” grandparents had a Black maid. We all called her by her first name; however, she never became overly familiar with any of us. I suspected that she liked it that way. That way, she could go home to her real life after work.

Many years later, I spent some time with those grandparents at their newer (before I was born) “Yankee” digs in Long Island. They had a new Black maid but were unhappy with her chosen name as not being dignified enough. She introduced herself to me as “Sammy” or something, while my grandmother corrected her with, “Samantha is so much nicer.”

I was not very close to this dirtfarmer-cum-educator-cum-putting on Yankee “educated” airs side of the family.

“Did you really have to rename her, grandmother?”

For what it’s worth, the best four years of my life were spent as the servant of Axel. It was not a lofty existence living in a flat in North Philadelphia then in a fifth wheel in Long Beach, California. My job was to rise before him and have his lunch, breakfast, thermoses, handrolled cigarettes, and ironed shirts ready. When he would order me to do something—anything—I would jump to fulfill it. When he came home, dinner was at least at the planning stage and was on time, kept warm, or ready to serve at 6:00 PM every day.

I also cleaned the place, shopped, laundry, did some computer work for him, or really anything he wanted. There was nothing that was beneath me. Far from it. Pleasing him was my whole life.

As a skilled craftsman/tradesman he outclassed me. Being of service to him was an honor.

I think that it is just media and consumerism which tells women that this job is somehow degrading.

It is an affront to Feminists.

I hate Feminists/Socialists who would put the responsibility of all outcomes in the hands of government.

It is not demeaning to separate oneself from the outcome-guaranteeing class.

Sometimes life happens though and here I am, without Axel, at the mercy of those who could not care less about me.

And so I speak my mind.









Inconvenient Truths

One of the reasons that I decided to be a technical writer rather than a journalist or political wag was that I suffered under the conceit that the truth had value.

When it comes to a valuable software and/or hardware package that costs a fortune to install, the time of all parties concerned has value. Therefore, it was my mission to make all of the technical publications I created accurate, efficient, and well-indexed. To that end, music to my ears was the voice of a product manager bellowing over the phone within my earshot:

“Did you read the manual? Read the manual!”

Persons on all ends of the product experience would congratulate me on the wonder of picking up a manual (of some 200 to 500 pages, depending on the product), thumbing through the index, finding the topic of interest, turning to the page, reading the short series of instructions, performing those instructions, and having the correct result achieved. This was my peak. I am today nowhere near as efficient or clear-headed.

Naturally, I put my heart and soul into this objective. Actually achieving recognition other than professional respect and of course the bottom line was never my aim. In other words, I was a fool.

To be placed upon a pedestal that one does not want is a prison. However, in a world where media and celebrity is king, such a concept does not compute to most people. Just the same, I appreciate living in a world where I exist. I write therefore I am.

There exists no attorney or district attorney who would want me on a jury. I’m all about consistency. Such a thing is rarely politically convenient except by providence.

Given my professional success it is somewhat of a mystery to many why I am not a Feminist and am even an outright regressive. Why would I deny other women the professional success I have achieved? What kind of monster would?

The answer is that this world does not actually materially, professionally, or socially reward truth. Therefore, putting the most vulnerable in positions such as the voting franchise such as to arbitrate “truth” is a gamble on the resilience of hope.

A Leftist “religion” has arisen such as to reward those who are in possession of the correct feelings with regard to truth. However, the mystique which surrounds its various priestesses—and femininity and emasculated men well prevail—is starting to become undone. It is my hope that in reaction women start to voluntarily withdraw from social arbitration and decision-making. Madison Avenue may tremble from such a prospect, but, I believe, is all for the best.



Man Shortage

I’ve been reading up on Margaret Sanger lately, reputedly the inspiration for Wonder Woman:

Superman débuted in 1938, Batman in 1939, Wonder Woman in 1941. She was created by William Moulton Marston, a psychologist with a Ph.D. from Harvard. A press release explained, “ ‘Wonder Woman’ was conceived by Dr. Marston to set up a standard among children and young people of strong, free, courageous womanhood; to combat the idea that women are inferior to men, and to inspire girls to self-confidence and achievement in athletics, occupations and professions monopolized by men” because “the only hope for civilization is the greater freedom, development and equality of women in all fields of human activity.” Marston put it this way: “Frankly, Wonder Woman is psychological propaganda for the new type of woman who should, I believe, rule the world.”

—Jill Lepore, author of the book The Secret History of Wonder Woman writing in The New Yorker.

Lepore continues:

In May, 1942, F.D.R. created the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps. A hundred and fifty thousand women joined the Army, filling jobs that freed more men for combat. The corps “appears to be the final realization of woman’s dream of complete equality with men,” Sanger wrote in the New York Herald-Tribune. But she was dismayed that the government didn’t provide contraceptives for WAACs and adopted a policy of dismissing any woman who got pregnant. “This new women’s Army is a great thing, a real test of the woman’s movement,” she said. “Never before has the fight for woman’s equality narrowed down to the real issue, sex.”

In 1943, Marston wrote a Wonder Woman story called “Battle for Womanhood.” It opens with Mars, the god of war, angry that so many American women are helping with the war effort.

“There are eight million American women in war activities—by 1944 there will be eighteen million!” one of Mars’ female slaves reports, dragging a ball and chain.

“If women gain power in war they’ll escape man’s domination completely!” Mars thunders. “They will achieve a horrible independence! . . . If women become warriors like the Amazons, they’ll grow stronger than men and put an end to war!”

Later in the article we learn about the evil male machinations which prevented women from creating a Wonder Woman utopia, in both fictional and historical fashion.

As I write this, there have been a rash of shootings of male police officers. These are the men who women rely on to keep us safe in an unsafe world, given that our own fathers, husbands, brothers, and sons have been hamstrung from doing so, legally, sociologically, politically, “morally,” and demographically—in some states more than others.

Recently, I tried to watch an hour-long videotaped conversation between Christina Hoff-Sommers and Camille Paglia, two women who have had a great influence on me. One, a wife and mother, and the other who calls herself “gay”. In her landmark book, Sexual Personae, Paglia describes her own persona as “male,” particularly as related to sex with women.

Try as I might, I could not concentrate for an entire hour on the mutual love-fest, which attempts to distinguish their versions of Feminism to the fright which Feminism has become.

In a sense, they are blonde Wonder Women, whose invisible and uncredited powers are men.

Some of the fawning and outright worshipful comments that I have heard and read from men of my generation and older with regard to the creative output of these two Amazons give me pause.

Similar remarks have been made about me, a “strong, independent, intelligent” woman. What? I have never been independent. I have no idea how to even navigate this world that I’ve been dropped in after 17 years of being isolated from it by The Han.

If being casually sexually serviced did it for me, I’d be in great shape. It doesn’t. The preponderance of offers to do just that leaves me cold.

These same men were delighted to live in what was once a Wonder Woman utopia of beautiful women giving out sex freely and seemingly taking over the responsibilities of men. What did they imagine was going on in the rest of the world at the time? Was their existence really that protected and insulated from demographic reality?

Where the policemen and security guards who enabled that utopian existence invisible to them?

The men sent to Vietnam certainly were.

Paglia of course has blatantly and “controversially” repeatedly identified within her independent works that it is men who create and maintain our world. However, in the above video, reminiscing of how good Feminism used to be, Paglia and the camera keeps the focus on the “feminine” woman with the invisible husband, in a lovely hairdo and make-up.

It’s the gentlemanly thing to do.

Black Lives Matter has been framing the protection and enforcement of laws by police officers as racist or of operating out of a disregard for the lives of Black Men. However, under our current methods of taxpayer-paid compensation to nonworking women, the life of a Black Male fails to have value to a Black Baby Momma when he is either not impregnating her or slipping her protective or monetary provisioning. In other words, he has a short shelf life.

However, the political and economic value of being a celebrity widow would appear to be worth a whole lot. Especially if the Hillary Clinton campaign guarantees it.

The movie I recommend on the phenomenon is Bonfire of the Vanities, particularly the character Annie Lamb. I’ve heard that the movie bombed at the box office. Gee. Any idea why?

Poor Morgan Freeman.


Once all protective and strong men of The West of any color have either been sent overseas, slaughtered, or disincentivized from lifting a finger to protect women, the entire West will inevitably be a Muslim Caliphate, unless some magic Atheist Scientology-loving Technocratic force decides that such a thing is contrary to their own interests, or Vladmir Putin decides that our lives matter.

As Brad Pitt’s character explains in the last scene of Killing Them Softly, the United States is “just a business.”

Decadence and Islam

I haven’t been very active lately on FetLife and I’ve closed all my online dating profiles months ago.

Occasionally I get an offer to be sexed/beaten by a male with demonstrated incapacity in deferred gratification, or to be the one to do the sexing/beating by an aspiring supplicant, or to do either including “getting to know you” purely electronically.

These offers provide me neither comfort nor titillation.

I remember my history in the greater BDSM community, whatever that is, which I suppose officially started when I was accepted as the submissive of a closeted bisexual man in San Francisco shortly after I turned 18. The “closet” part was his heterosexual side.

He later went “straight”. I think I can take some credit although that wasn’t my intention particularly given his carefully hidden ambition to farm babies with the state paying for that “freedom” of his. I don’t regret declining that offer.

Fast forward after an adulthood in my physical prime replete with men pretending to be Dominants and Masters who were merely interested in being thought sexy or powerful as a salve for previous life grievances, or were even merely squirreling away political influence and money (sometimes mine!) so as to have the means of decadent fulfillment to their taste once their charm failed to attract sufficiently juicy parasitic hosts, or were already the hosts themselves to a parade of emotionally/financially manipulative blood suckers.

But then I met Axel—the love of my life. I thought this meant that once again, the BDSM community was my tribe. It wasn’t. Probably never was. Axel died. I’m still around though and unfathomably healthy such as to be free of all known disease of physical origin.

My brain however provides poisons that most are best advised to forego.

I’ve likely “peaked” at least in the U.S. Even so, the idea of watching the U.S. from afar with live human beings with attention span, entirely irrespective of private sexual practices, even if that means celibacy for yours truly appeals more and more.

Stale virtue signallers and dating-by-catalogue types are invited to read the following before you determine that Islam is an option preferable to self-restraint. Probably too long for you to read though.

Best you just click on the online dating profile of an Equal Opportunity vagina or someone else less discerning with regard to your brand of rhetoric—with or without clever memes:

Sybaritic West Surrenders to Islamists

Please do not assume that my inclusion of the above link means that I’ve succumbed to mainstream propaganda with regard to conspiracy theories. Rather, I’m developing one of my own. It’s quite the long game.

Beating the Gay out of Boys

In my insistence on defending homosexual male behavior in Disqus discussions, I’ve come upon some theories with regard to men of my generation, and others, who grew up being beaten by their fathers.

In some cases, Dad was just trying to “toughen up” junior, which considering our dystopia might have had really good intentions. In other cases, it was to ensure that junior wouldn’t turn out to be gay. In some cases the idea that junior could possibly be gay was offensive or of conflicting appeal to Dad when it came to religious ideas of either abomination or the temptation of vice. There may also have been a chivalry component.

If society would appear to be crumbling such as to diminish possibilities of outcomes for little princess, then it might just be junior’s fault for not “manning up”, but instead succumbing to “vice” with the “abomination” of homosexual sex. In other words, in this view, male homosexual sex is an evidence of poor character or otherwise not having the ability to resist “temptation”.

However, the beating itself, being a violation of boundaries, might be the factor to initiate narcissistic or codependent sexuality, whether translated as homosexual or not. It is the violation of boundaries of the self which causes the feedback loop of requiring validation of self from another, in order to feel “whole”.

Axel was beaten badly by his father. Not because his father thought he was gay or to toughen him up, but because Axel’s mother had somehow persuaded his father to translate all of her dissatisfaction arising from her narcissistic insecurity onto his son. In other words, it was a perverse form of chivalry.

I tend to believe that these pathologies of both mother and father arose out of memory of The Great Depression. Instead of blaming the appropriate causes, I think that men blamed men and themselves and women blamed women and themselves in response to propaganda from Church, State, media, and marketing. It is easier to blame character in others (and oneself) for traumatic events than it is to realize just how helpless we are as citizens in the face of overwhelming corruption in industry and government, and the weight of demographics that diminish the possibilities of satisfactory outcomes for all.

It’s rats-in-a-cage syndrome.

Monogamy, in my view, is the most basic cause of this corruption. Female hypergamy and male chivalry are human characteristics that make life worthwhile in my view. Leveling the field, despite the fanciful notions of equalists, is not likely to actually teach women anything because I don’t think most women have the capacity to understand, regardless of how well they are educated or how “intelligent” they are.They’ll just get meaner, demanding more and more provisioning from the State.

I say, “they” because my own experiences well outweigh my historical education in terms of learning how these dynamics work, specifically, the overall lack of protectiveness from my father, which is not so different from being fatherless, but without having a strong female group to turn to either, or mother, and so effectively motherless. In a lot of ways, I have more in common with transwomen than I do cis-women; specifically, transwomen who are nonfeminist and are sexually attracted to men.

The regular and severe beatings that Axel suffered may or may not have had an effect on Axel’s growth. He started out in youth as “above average” and then just stopped growing. Extreme stress combined with possible injuries to his adrenals can do that to a child. Fortunately, he was able to put on highly efficient muscles and broad shoulders, otherwise he would not have been able to finally succeed in defending himself against these assaults, definitively, even though his father remained much taller than he was. Axel had a deep well of viciousness capable of direction to appropriate targets, as well as a highly developed sense of biomechanics and physics, which became part of his courses of study.

On the opposite spectrum, in my case, I think that the very different stresses that I was subject to as a child caused me to overproduce cortisol which converted in my body to testosterone, giving me an ability to put on mass, in terms of muscle and bone, which make my body different from most White women. Therefore, being confused for a transwoman, particularly in the modern age, is not so uncommon for me. I’m not offended. I think it’s funny.

It would seem however that this condition of mine is becoming more common not less.

Part of the reason for my humor in being mistaken for a transwoman had to do with Axel’s attraction to and from them. I got to meet quite a few. As per Axel’s taste, they were all fairly convincing such that they would have no trouble using a ladies’ room in that no one would notice.

In terms of the chivalrous hostility toward gay men stemming largely from Conservatives, Axel was thereby a continued recipient of it by proxy. Since he wasn’t provisioning women, men knew that they could gain brownie points from weak women by virtue-signalling their disdain for Axel, rhetorically. This trash talk didn’t stop women from throwing themselves at Axel however. On the contrary. Moreover it did provide a teaching moment to straight women in terms of why they ought not to expect provisioning from Axel, even though Axel was plenty chivalrous particularly in terms of feats of strength, counsel, and any of the many mechanical and physical skills he could put to bear for practical purposes. He just wasn’t going to take any of them in and marry them, much less pay the lion’s share of expenses. Besides, he had no use for the trappings of suburbia or urban appearances.

In terms of how God looks at gay male homosexuality, I regret that I do not have enough faith in men’s use of language to put much credence in modern interpretations of scripture. I believe that a certain level of male homosexuality in society is inevitable even though its existence indicates a demographic to opportunity imbalance of some sort. Since we’re never going to have a perfectly balanced world, then gay male sexuality is normal and expected. That doesn’t mean that I believe that it should be advocated. I just find it to be, as Gore Vidal believed, more of a financial issue than a “moral” one, in that patronizing competing temples where prostitution of all sorts was offered was supporting other religions. In other words, it was idolatry.

Whereas certainly narcissistic behavior of any sort is pathological, I fail to see the narcissism of a Conservative gay man who desires to build a better world by his own output rather than the provisioning of taxpayers. In a sense, such a man is not only manning up but is likely supplementing the lives of women through his taxes. That’s not fair.

If Jews decided that there was no allowable percentage of gay men allowed in their midst, I wonder if this was due to pressure from their wives and daughters to force such men to provision them. This would typify “Jewish American Princess” behavior. It would certainly seem so. What if the whole interpretation of scripture is wrong, based on generations of “empowering” women through Monogamous marriage?

Axel on the other hand was very kind and paternal toward gay men although he had no sexual attraction to them. A transwoman on the other hand who was convincingly feminine was attractive to him.

I suspect that as cis-women become more obnoxious, more transwomen will be displacing them in romantic relationships. This competition just might be the teaching moment to heterosexual women, because it engages their competitive nature.

Men with traditional ideas about putting women on pedestals are going to be particularly resistant to gay rights as being contrary to the provisioning of heterosexual women. It is not “phobia” but rather a threat to the worldview of female free choice and independence. However, I don’t believe that women are actually happy with this free choice. Rather, it is a projection on the part of men subconsciously urging women to “man up” to meet the void of men and masculinity in the world.

It is not going to work and certainly will not forestall invasion by La Raza or Islam.







Sodomy vs. Polygamy

It would seem to me that Christians are so determined to hang on to monogamy that a global Caliphate is practically inevitable. Apparently, to all too many Right-wing Christians, a society that allows Sodomy is [edit] intolerable, but questioning the goodness of monogamy as the only legal standard of marriage, even though there’s no scripture basis for monogamy, is unthinkable.

As for Left-wing Christians, they would appear to be appeasing and abetting Islam in record numbers.

I mean, really? Is that how Christianity will end? I’m not a Christian but I’m starting to feel sorry for all the henpecked Christian men, in a strictly maternal sense. Whereas most Arabic men I’ve known are essentially chemically castrated (epigenetically) given the completely decadent predation by their oligarchies; therefore, Islam is not an improvement, except on a highly piecemeal basis.

It just goes to show that there’s such a thing as too large of a harem, just for the sake of one that is. No man in his right mind would want more women than he can control, and by control I’m not talking about sophisticated surveillance, security, or even mind-control technology which comes increasingly necessary in a dystopic world.

In my world, game would suffice. Women of my world, love irrational control, and such can benefit from competition with other women rather than appeasement.

I’m not entirely opposed to decadence, don’t get me wrong. I just know that it’s love that makes life worthwhile. I’m not entirely certain that it would be worth it to collect an overlarge harem/coven without love, although doubtless those who do so can rationalize or irrationalize it (that is, “For Allah”).

Even sodomy can be irrationalized (“For Allah”) which is not to say that Islam allows for ordinary men to do what they want, ever, unless it’s for purposes of forcing submission or degrading infidels.

Among Christians, monogamy is what produces the decadence, demographically, in the long run. This causes that love they seem to believe they have a monopoly on to lose its savor. Love shouldn’t have to mean, “worship the woman!” That’s positively Egyptian!

Meanwhile, every over-inflated bubble produces a correction, and the bursting of the gynocentrism bubble will not be pretty.

Gay men don’t worship women! At least not sexually. Women demanding to be the center of attention get tiresome to mature gay men who take responsibility for their own outcomes, specifically, those on the Right.

I sympathize with the Lesbian-adverse views of Milo, among everything else he says in this video: Milo at Orlando Shooting Site (Queued at 12 Minutes)

I’d kiss him too! (Then he, like Gavin McInnes, might be the one to gag afterwards, but hey, what do you say, Milo?)

In a sense, the Jews perform a tremendous service for the Christians determined to demand that either children be produced within all populations or celibacy imposed, women be worshiped, and gay men reviled. That service, specifically, is to oppress the peasantry. Otherwise, farm nutrition plus reproductivity can cause the peasantry to over-expand their numbers, particularly when the ovulation cycle has been disrupted by grain-dependence. The engineered solutions which Jewish economics, sociology, and demographics have devised keep that population in check, to a point. In a technocracy however, there’s no check on either oligarchic or Jewish power. The balancing act has therefore become broken, and largely due to Feminism.

Overpopulation relative to resources not only produces homosexuality (and thank goodness!) but other sorts of abnormal sexuality to include behaviors which destroy culture, eventually, such as pedophilia, narcissism, Communism, and Anarchy. A preponderance of homosexuality is, in my view, the first piece of evidence that there are too many people relative to resources and opportunity, compounded by stale, entrenched oligarchy. It’s the canary in the coal mine. It can be found among all animals for the same reason.

But killing the canary won’t solve a thing! Besides, gay men and bisexual women are very useful to society! Lesbians (sorry!) less so. However, under monogamy, lesbianism is inevitable, followed by far worse, as demographic imbalance proceeds.

For more on Anarchy, I recommend Steve Sailer: Anarchy in the U.S.A.

My comment to the piece held in moderation due to my spelling out of the word “asshole” I assume, is here:

Whereas gay men and bisexual women are the canary in the coal mine, when lesbianism in society becomes more and more obvious and obnoxious, it’s only a matter of time before the canary dies.

Meanwhile, the Jewish version of monogamy is no improvement over the Christian version. But they have made themselves essential to the Christian oligarchy, who in turn have made themselves essential to the Islamic oligarchy. For now.

The Left, of course, is just fine with Islamic and Jewish money, and imposes their own ideology on pain of starvation and homelessness. When will Christians, Jews, and the unaffiliated Right come up with a legal challenge in terms of Islamic monopoly on polygamy? In my lifetime? Are they prepared to die for monogamy???

The Left however is fine with female-dominated group-marriage, and welfare to subsidize the reproductivity of single women, while many secretly hope that some handsome sheik will come along, and give them some of that “magic” they’ve been craving, such as is available to decadent European divorcées in Morocco for a price. Effectively castrated married men in the U.S. are mostly being homosexually serviced by Peggers and “Bulls” with the latter I suspect having more than its share of convicts. Convicts of course convert in order to gain some protection against being predated upon while in prison, as well as for a host of benefits such as better food.

Black American Muslims are blatantly used as tools in order to advance the Caliphate, for their largely stabilizing influence on communities predated upon by Leftism. However, if history repeats, Arabic Muslims will castrate them when no longer useful. Meanwhile, there’s no harm in pandering to them as well as to Leftist institutions of all sorts.

Speaking of Black American Islam’s views on homosexuality: Farrakhan responds to Pres. Obama endorsing Gay marriage.

Leftists who believe that Islamists have to “Hate” in order to slaughter homosexuals aren’t paying attention. Rather, one only needs to love Allah in order to commit Jihad. However, don’t expect a straightforward answer from an Islamic spokesperson on how that works, as they are required by Islam to lie to us.

Detain and Question that Woman!

There are many theories going around as to the two recent shootings in Orlando Florida. This is an urgent call to demand the detaining, questioning, and otherwise inconveniencing of one infamous vixen by the name of Dita Von Teese.

Miss Dita Von Teese is the former wife of Marilyn Manson, the artist responsible for the Columbine massacre. Miss Von Teese is thereby an appeaser of the chief bewitcher of Goth-music-loving young men who sadly became so disturbed by listening to this music, that they shot up a school. She’s “The Devil’s Music” muse!

The Climate of Hate brought about by Donald Trump is a similar menace.

It is this Climate of Hate which caused, one, or perhaps two confused young men, according to some accounts, or even three, to fire off guns within a closed building for a surprisingly long time, just like at Columbine.

With a reputation like hers, Miss Von Teese, is a highly suspicious person who needs to be questioned immediately. There is no time to waste. She could be appeasing who knows how many horrible straight men who would dare sell a gun to a poor confused son of an immigrant Afghanistani politician who just happens to have a security clearance. She might even be a Trump supporter!

That Columbine is a weapons-manufacturing town is of no concern whatsoever. Neither are the preponderance of Gay Republicans in Orlando. That information should have no bearing on Miss Von Teese’s highly suspiciously tight corset.

Fortunately, all places where people who gather in order to learn, play, listen, or whatever, can protect themselves from the cruel influence of Miss Von Teese by installing extremely expensive thought-control devices at their entrances, and frisking all corset-wearers…

And cigar smokers! (See comments).


Tearing People Apart

Bernie Saunders and his supporters prefer the fog of marijuana.

Frank Davis

Quick Hitts carries a Bernie Sanders campaign ad in which he says he’s about “bringing people together.” Dave Hitt’s response:

A half a lifetime ago, I was part of an informal group of cigar smokers who regularly met at a brew pub, where we were welcomed by the management. There were about twenty of us. It would be hard to imagine a more diverse group. We were different races, had different educational backgrounds and were on different rungs of the socioeconomic ladder. Our politics and religious beliefs were all over the place. We had different jobs and different interests. The only thing we all had in common was the love of fine cigars.

We’d meet at a large table, light up good cigars (often gifting some back and forth), and have some good drinks. Then we’d have a good meal, followed by another round of cigars.

Everything was good, but the…

View original post 320 more words

Banned from CCOK

If you don’t know what the above stands for, I apologize. If you do, you do.

In any case, it all has something to do with this and this.

I have the former largely (but not completely) archived.

I do not apologize for calling a paid Warmist operative a Hate Crime Collaborator.

Rest in Peace, Joan Rivers.

Is it All About Sanders?

It occurs to me that the events which led to my being banned from AVFM are ultimately not just due to the fact that I’m more supportive of the PUA‘s than the Socialist MGTOW’s, but because, mythically, Bernie Sanders was supposed to be the guiding light of the Socialist MGTOW’s, and I’m represented through their kaleidoscope glasses as the archetype embodiment of his nemesis, thanks to sixties era television.

In other words, the supposedly politically-neutral AVFM is being moderated by a Socialist element, such that the fact that I happen to be a regressive authoritarian, anti-universalist separatist, and male-supremacist, would make me an enemy of the Equalist Socialist paradise that certain marginalized men foresee as their endgame Shangri-La.

Perhaps now that Jude Law’s security crew has been attacked by “gentle cappuccino-colored migrants who are coming for the sole purpose of enriching Europe’s stale, oppressive culture,” those elements of the “North American Manosphere” who persist in the notion that there is no rapefugee culture in Europe might just change their tune. The reason for this change of tune might be that a celebrity MGTOW (a.k.a. mostly perpetually unmarried Leftist male who gleefully sows oats with female Leftists who never wear aprons or do housework because such women are the enemy) was attacked, and doubtless his “security crew,” who was also attacked, is also male.

Sorry boys, or rather men, Bernie Sanders isn’t going to save you despite penis even though those trad-con bitches don’t want to talk to you thus making you a pet “victim”, so “man up!”

Or don’t. I don’t care. I just hate to see you get sucked into the wrong side of a religious war that has been going on ever since there has ever been too many people for too few opportunities. The war is “communitarianism” vs. “authoritarianism”.

Truth is, I’m not interested in seeing Islam abolished but rather, I’m leaning toward the notion of Balkanized Theocracies. If so many women insist on throwing themselves at Islamic criminals, this represents a need for a male-supremacist order of some sort, and wouldn’t it be nice if elements of European Culture would “man up” to provide their own such that beauties don’t go getting themselves mangled, raped, and killed by warring elements in their efforts to be dominated, finally, and otherwise taken off the damned pedestal.

I’m thinking that various feuding Christian factions need to revitalize Deuteronomy as a counterweight to Sharia Law and The Talmud. Naturally, they don’t all agree on how. I am in debt to this blog in terms of how gynocentricism killed the Church. Let’s get back to basics, fellows, can’t we?

European women are tired of being placed on pedestals (including “Equalist” ones) by Beta men, to only be attacked and killed by the sons of angry women of color. Please fellas. Man up!