I am inspired by a Mike Wallace interview of Margaret Sanger today and wonder how many quotes attributed to her were planted and fabricated by entrenched interests with less than holy agendas:
The video starts out as an ad for unfiltered Phillip Morris cigarettes. I love the ad.
Filters on cigarettes disguise the presence of cheap fillers and substandard tobacco. Cheap product is inevitable after all the taxes added in by overblown agendas of all sorts, in order to pay for their overblown agendas. It is a tax on smokers to pay for Dogooderism, specifically, “anti-smoking bureaucracy” which tends to attract women as employees and administrators.
The smoke itself is also more likely to offend. It’s stale and cheap.
Smoking cessation chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturers step in to form public/private partnerships. They hire women preferentially too, such as to force prisoners, mental hospital inmates, school children, and all other captive individuals to listen to these product shills promoting fabricated statistics.
Must listen to the women! Doesn’t matter that they’re peddling complete crap. Not allowing them uninterrupted access to our minds is somehow “unchivalrous”.
Nicotine, like any phytochemical, is no more addictive than any other phytochemical. Some phytochemicals are estrogenic; whereas nicotine is testosterogenic and provides benefits to cognition, mental focus, and anti-plaque of the brain. Hence it has been the preferred contemplative aid to writers and storytellers since it came to exist.
Whereas women who demand that everyone listen to whatever they have to say regardless of their own addiction to affirmation that they are paid to indulge is a matter of values not Science.
If nicotine was so addictive, so many smokers would not find it possible to quit smoking with no “help” from Dogooders or chemicals at all! Besides, there’s always the nicotine in tomatoes, eggplant, and califlower if one wants to stimulate one’s brain to produce anti-Dogooderism wit, assuming that comedy can survive forced pandering to regressives demanding that entertainment and expression of all sorts be “filtered”.
When smokers are unable to afford cigarettes except those comprised of stale tobacco, then two things are likely to occur:
- Foul-smelling cheap cigarettes reinforce the idea to Dogooders that “tobacco is bad”.
- Bootleg cigarettes containing better quality tobacco appear, as promoted by criminals, by definition. ‘Criminals are bad! Tobacco is bad!’ shriek the regressives.
Men idly contemplating anything rather than pandering to the women around them looks like a problem that “Science” can solve. The cigarette becomes the hot, slim, and sexy competitor to the Feminist agenda of universal male enslavement, along with the enslavement of all attractive young women to monopolist agendas.
However the regressives also say that Black is good and White is bad! Therefore, when a very small time tobacco criminal dies, then, it must be White people’s fault! Bad bad White Men!
I think it is hilarious that it turns out that a Black female sergeant has been charged with not effectively supervising the arrest of Eric Garner. Her fellow officers of course chivalrously defend her because she is an attractive young woman. Perhaps she is not intrinsically qualified to supervise anyone simply from Blackness or Femaleness. Or perhaps she is not tall enough to see!
Chivalry is not quite dead…yet.
What Pro-Lifers and Pro-Choicers can both agree on is that regressives, single women with children, young women driven by hormones, and most failed women in general, are easy to pander to by rhetoric alone, or you can lift them up on your shoulders.
Thank God for Citizen Ruth. The bottom line is money, honey. Even a glue-sniffer could figure that out.
Women are good! Men are bad! Women need more babies! Women whose only claim to societal usefulness is reproduction are, as Ann Coulter points out, narcissistic. https://youtu.be/QI3FE4pI_kw
Here’s a little uncomfortable demographic trend math from my lips to your ears, Dear Reader:
As regressives increase in numbers, they engage in mob actions such as BAMN. Regressives can be found among each and every ethnic group.
Throwing more babies at regressives who depend on mob knee-jerk reaction to all “bad” ideas defies rationality, unless one is profiting from mob knee-jerk reactions.
As I continue to watch the Margaret Sanger interview, I take note that Sanger has a stronger grasp of Arizona agricultural conditions than do most virtue-signalers condemning the words of Russell Pearce:
“A lot of lazy people seem to have mistaken the government for a charity. That’s not how things were meant to work,” Pearce said. “And food stamps are draining the budget faster than it takes a drunkard to kill a bottle of whiskey. And this is not the case with Arizona alone, this is going on nationwide. We need to put this under control or else we’re looking at bankruptcy. And everybody is making jokes about it instead of trying to find a solution. Well, I have.”
Pearce then went on to explain how “we need to limit food stamp access to women who have been sterilized,” and how “that’s the only way of separating the ones who are willing to work for food from those who aren’t.” Asked whether that means women will, effectively, be made to give up the prospect of having children in the future simply because of the fact that they’re poor, the former state senator replied, “In order to be able to feed a baby, you first need to be able to feed yourself. That’s a pre-requisite in this case. What can I say, there’s no such thing as a free lunch.”
Senator George McGovern apparently disagreed with Margaret Sanger’s mathematically-driven conclusions that there are limits on what land can produce in terms of crops. Chemical fertilizers and gas-guzzling machinery comprised his “Green Revolution” in order to produce crops as promiscuously as regressive babies popping out of regressive mothers.
The “filter” on nutrient deficient food such as to disguise its empty taste is the suppression of taste buds by means of poor training of those taste buds from formula to commercial baby food. Even if that junk is free.
If you have no taste then you don’t miss what you’ve never had, except that it will be forced upon you with promiscuous consumption movies and “entertainment” such that all it takes is a sledgehammer to your neighbor’s door and all that yummy “taste” can be yours.
Arizona as a state, then as now, defies quantity of agricultural yield (paid for by monopolist multinationals with an eye toward generations of dependence), except that which is trucked in.
Sheer numbers of regressives benefit a host of entrenched interests, from The Church to The Bureacracy, from the Democratic Party to Lotharios, from the door to door saleswoman (or her son), to the one collecting for “charity”, from Industrialists to Slavers.
Elite investors of course benefit from the volatility of forcing inflated populations upon each other.
How many women does any society need? Lots of them! The stupider the better. In that sense Muslims Are the True Feminists.
Anything that might disturb the quietude of regressive women must be filtered away or covered in a burkha. There there. You don’t have to look at or listen to that! Now spread em, Baby.
The Government Harem awaits you with open arms. All you need to do is make more of you, and money like goodness will rain down upon you.
Pay no attention to bad women like Margaret Sanger who understand simple math. Math is bad.
She just had to be a bad eugenicist. Right? I was wrong. I admit it. I was fooled.
Trucking in regressive population overflow from Latin America and Islamic countries won’t cause the Arizona desert to bloom with anything good-er than bodies.