Dear Roosh

 

I don’t know a lot about you as generally I give PUA’s their safe space. I’m probably mostly immune to whatever game you’re hyping anyway (but am always flattered when I’m deemed worthy of the effort).

Meanwhile, I applaud your efforts toward traditionalism and found absolutely nothing offensive (on your part) in these two videos:

Roosh Press Conference – Washington DC – February 6, 2016

And

Chat with Roosh

The latter contains a brilliant analysis of the mainstream press today after their appalling behavior in the former.

I am a huge fan of Karen Straughan, the interviewer of the second piece, even if at a personal level we would appear to be very different people (we’d probably get along).

  1. I am not an atheist.
  2. I’m an unapologetic heterosexual male supremacist, who just so happens to be a former BDSM “celebrity masochist”. I’m still a masochist just not so much of a celebrity (“Caprizchka” is a relatively recent moniker) such that it is risky to even appear to agree with me on anything.
  3. I’m not nearly as calm, cool, rational, informed, and prepared as she is.

However this letter is directed toward Roosh and his romantic aspirations.

I believe that one of the foremost obstacles in lasting heterosexual relationships whether by benefit of state-sanctioned “marriage” or not, is the idealized concept of “romantic love” between “equals”, or “partnership” or “friendship”. Of course there should be some elements of the latter two but that position ought to be earned, by her, after however long a period of servitude renders the desired results. My opinion.

There is nothing abusive about an age and/or power gap between a man and a woman in a lifetime commitment. It is what most women crave as evidenced by their pornographic reading material. Such is nearly impossible with a nanny state, but, still achievable and totally worth it. This is not a “friendship” or “partnership” except to outside eyes, for legal purposes. Rather it is an employer/employee relationship wherein it is her job to please him, or rather, you.

It’s a great job!

Naturally, a successful employer learns what makes his employee tick and otherwise how to arouse her passions…to please him, for life, for sex, etc. It is a relationship that never needs to stop because it will continuously evolve, require open and honest communication, and otherwise needs to have all vows reaffirmed at intervals, including those which may be illegal.

A woman who wants this sort of relationship must be continuously reminded, especially during difficult times, just how precious and difficult it is to find and maintain such a relationship; however, that challenge alone is huge, and threat of endangering the magic of the dynamic may be enough to sustain even the most dopamine-dependent media addict with conditioned short attention-span and institutionally-engineered craving for “novelty”. It is a matter of principle and integrity.

If on religious grounds it’s better for both of your souls, so much the more compelling.

There is no better entertainment than to be a productive, appreciated, sex object. By “productive” I mean, usefulness beyond the mere sexual, such as childcare, cooking, keeping house, or even being an on-the-job assistant at whatever entrepreneurial venture he may be involved in? To be pleasant and interesting, attractive, and an asset is rewarding. It is why women foolishly joined the workforce (those who weren’t forced to do so).

Give her a set of attractive uniforms, with aprons and kneepads, to wear!

A man such as you would require, in my opinion, a woman who is not a media attention whore but yet assertive enough to give the press the finger; i.e., “It is my choice as a woman not to engage with you. Your approval and attention doesn’t motivate me. Rather, the only approval and attention which motivates me is that which comes from Roosh.”

Just my opinion. All the best to you, including the future, hypothetical Mrs. Roosh.

By the way, with regard to the ending comments of the second video (with Karen Straughan)? There is absolutely nothing wrong with seeking a woman who desires to drink in your sweat like it’s expensive perfume. It is. There’s nothing better. It’s a privilege. Of course smell tells a lot. It also tells her how well she’s feeding you.

That manly scent of yours causes sympathetic hormonal reactions in her which help settle issues from PMS through menopause. Consider it a health and beauty regimen secret, for her.

Like I said, it may be dangerous to even appear to be on my same page on just about anything. Next thing you know, the self-indulgent nepotistic media will be decrying “perspiration abuse” or whatever.

 

7 thoughts on “Dear Roosh

  1. Pingback: Dear Roosh – Manosphere.com

  2. “There is no better entertainment than to be a productive, appreciated, sex object. By “productive” I mean, usefulness beyond the mere sexual, such as childcare, cooking, keeping house, or even being an on-the-job assistant at whatever entrepreneurial venture he may be involved in? To be pleasant and interesting, attractive, and an asset is rewarding.”

    This is so true lol.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s